Month: August 2018

The Evolution of Mirai Botnet Source Code Presents Increased Risk of Large-Scale DDoS Attacks

Over the past few years, several major distributed denial-of-service (“DDoS”) attacks took place, including a major event affecting the domain name service provider Dyn, which caused outages and slowness for a number of popular sites, including Amazon, Netflix, Reddit, SoundCloud, Spotify, and Twitter. However, since several of these large, highly-publicized attacks occurred in 2016, […]

GDPR and AML – a perfect pair?

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has been one of the most highly anticipated and talked about changes to the legal sphere in years, affecting the vast majority of businesses and individuals alike. The primary focus to date has been on the implementation deadline of 25 May 2018 and the […]

Ohio Enacts Liability “Safe Harbor” for Entities That Maintain Specified Cybersecurity Programs

On August 3, 2018, Ohio Governor John R. Kasich announced that he signed Substitute Senate Bill 220 (“SB 220” or “Bill”) that, in part, affords a litigation “safe harbor” to covered entities that implement, maintain, and comply with specified cybersecurity programs. Covered entities, e.g., businesses, sued after a data breach […]

FAQs on the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 – Part 2a: The CCPA Rights

In our next two FAQ installments on the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (“CaCPA” or “Act”), we will focus on the individual rights established by the CaCPA, including the right to: Know what personal information is being collected about the consumer Know whether the consumer’s personal information is sold […]

FAQs on the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 – Part 1: The Basics

On June 28, 2018, the California Legislature passed Assembly Bill 375 and enacted the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (the “CCPA” or the “Act”). The Legislature rushed the bill through in order to preempt a more stringent privacy initiative from appearing on the November ballot, which if passed would have been difficult to amend or repeal. […]